India’s political and economic destiny would have significantly altered during the UPA-I and UPA-II tenure had the High Command would have weighed and zeroed on appointing Shri Pranab Mukherjee as its Prime Ministerial candidate. History can never be repeated. In Pranab Mukherjee, fondly called Pranab-Da in a significant career spanning over more than four decades, lied a statesman par excellence and legal cum political acumen playing an important role in contributing significantly to India’s economic destiny as well as the guardian of the Indian constitution as Head of State following diverse roles as Finance, Defence and Commerce Ministry among a host of 10 portfolios held and deputy chairman of the Planning Commission.
The 13th President of the Indian Republic, Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha Member in his autobiography The Coalition Years mentions the Economic Reforms ushered in the 90s and following which PV Narsimha Rao lost the election as Congress PM. He remarked on the extent to which the major reforms impacted the Indian elite and the benefits were yet trickling to the masses.
As Finance Minister during the Indira Gandhi era, Pranab-da ushered into a slew of economic reforms and the year was 2004 when Congress leading the UPA-I may have thought about him as PM candidate and in 2009 the thought again crossed Congress chairperson Sonia Gandhi in the event Dr. Manmohan Singh could serve as President. The observations are revealing on the role Pranab Mukherjee could have played in India. Of course, during UPA-I, he refused the Finance portfolio in favor of the External Affairs Ministry. On the day of swearing-in, Mukherjee was told that he would be handling the Defense ministry, he remarks in the book.
As an important member of the then UPA-I Government, he played an immense role in chartering India’s path and one among which is the Indo-US Civil Nuclear Agreement which we read in newspapers grabbing eyeballs in 2008 was passing the floor test remained the real deal. Many experts give credit rightfully to Dr. Manmohan Singh whose biggest gamble paid off. Very few knew Pranab-Da’s role was an instrumental role stitching alliance saving the Government from collapse and we all know the Left and Shiv Sena, known to be a natural BJP ally offered unconditional support at that time. In the biography, he offers a rare insight into his conversation with Condoleezza Rice the US State Secretary.
Right from chairing more than 100 groups of ministers to prepare a draft road map for the 90s economic reforms, anti-corruption ombudsman, to the stimulus package of 2008 playing a significant to guard against economic bankruptcy and signing WTO Trade Agreements, the achievements are many in his rich career as a politician, Minister and Head of State shaping a modern India.
The 26/11 terrorist attack finds a place in Pranab Mukherjee biography and in his own words, “do not believe in romanticizing relations or indulging in any sort of adventurism, but there is a limit to one’s patience. We are truly concerned” during a conversation with foreign leaders. He mentions speaking to 100 foreign ministers across countries which were a mammoth task and presaging on the strong role he played for the Government at that time. Of course, there were ideological differences on one hand, between the socialist Pranab Da and the other between Chidambaram and PM-designate at that time Dr. Manmohan Singh. But, one thing that stood out in his book excerpt about explaining in the simplest manner about how the DTAA work out inferring to amendments taking place in the IT Act. He explains the need for Tax certainty in the better interest of India as a country and the right to tax business on similar transactions across jurisdictions.
Dr. Singh as PM had reservations on amendments impacting FDI while for Pranab Mukherjee it was about in India being a ‘no tax or low tax nation’ where all taxpayers, residents, or nonresidents are treated on parity. It works like that under the country law on tax paid in one country and there is no need to pay in another country where transactions take place under DTAA. As simple as it gets. The logic goes that tax must be paid and ringing in accountability.
As India’s former President breathed his last, one wonders what India would have been without his contribution, the legal acumen, and ability to nurture relationships across the broader political spectrum, the astute mind, and from President, to Citizen Mukherjee, he had so much to offer. And, to think Sonia Gandhi refused that he be made President in 2009 for fear of losing a captain in the ship. It says a lot about the role he played in the UPA Government. In one of his interviews on NDTV after his tenure as Head of State, he discussed lynching giving a bad name to the core Indian, secular values distinctively as a tolerant nation. I think it speaks a lot about the Indian values and albeit, the constitution. Trust him to be honest when he unequivocally speaks that secularism cannot be partitioned by speaking about only one side but not the other. We can disagree with him but one thing that cannot be denied is his ability to speak fearlessly.
The achievements are incredible. The ‘soft reformer’ defined by the media was the architect behind a slew of reforms such as administrative reforms, Right to Information, Right to Employment, IT, setting up of UIDAI, and Metro Rail chairing 85 Ministerial Groups as per Hindustan Times. The Right to Information is something very dear to me and playing a huge role as we speak about freedom and the right for citizens to know boosting accountability. So many times, we take our rights for granted and forgetting about the forbearer where we call to fill an RTI to know about our rights. Pranab Da or what he called himself post Presidency ‘Citizen Mukherjee’ steered such reforms together with decisions setting up rural banks, EXIM Bank of India, and the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development.
Five times Rajya Sabha and twice Lok Sabha Member, Shri Pranab Mukherjee was held in awe and respect by his Opponents such as the ruling BJP and PM Modi with whom he served as Head of State. The former testified how President Pranab offered sound advice to the new PM and the freshly elected Government in place during 2014. Many are regaled tales by journalists how they were chided by Pranab-Da in his entire political career for a wrong move but at the same time, it’s a huge learning and rigorous training by interacting with this wealth of knowledge.
Perhaps, one of my biggest regret as a young scribe is when I missed interacting with him in the country I was based during his State Visit. I didn’t push so hard to interview Pranab Mukherjee since was unaware he was someone that warms up to interaction and a lost opportunity
Statesman and the bonhomie lacking in today’s politics, India’s former President knew how to cultivate relationships armed with a rare finesse makes him count among the few in Indian politics respecting the decorum and values at a time where discourse is sinking lower. Pranab-Da was always called the referee in the Congress Party and playing a significant contribution in Modern India as well as posing as the last Mohican for his party. It’s doesn’t go without saying that as Head of State he upheld our constitutional values with this ability to make the Rashtrapathi Bhavan accessible to the commoner by discouraging people to address him as His Excellency. The PM that never was and making for palatable tales studying Pranab Ji’s career milestones by history, political and journalism students.
Fare Well Citizen Mukherjee.
Love and Respect
V